The First Amendment was not written to protect the people of this country
from religious values;
it was written to protect religious values from government tyranny.
As time allows, while I find myself sitting and waiting for this appointment
or that appointment, I have tried desperately to steal those precious moments of self
and empty time to read a bit further into David Fiorazo’s book The Cost of our Silence.
The following excerpt is truly an amazing tasty tidbit of what is, for all intent purposes,
a lynchpin of lost history.
The excerpt explores the long ago written words that shed a long-ignored light onto a
dark assumption…an assumption we have allowed to become the sole driving wedge
piercing deeply into the heart of Christianity in America.
It was never meant to be what it has become as it was in actuality a mere excerpt from a letter…
And yet our justice system, Government, legal eagles and every atheist in the county
have each had a hand in finagling this small section of a letter into becoming something so much
more than what it was ever intended to be.
Mr. Fiorazo explains…
There are citizens today who still don’t realize the phrase “separation of church and state”
does not exist anywhere in the United States Constitution.
Earlier drafts of what became the Frist Amendment are valuable in understanding our founders’
Emphasizing the fact that denomination was one of the words proposed
when drafting the meaning of the Establishment Clause is vital to comprehending their objective.
They wanted complete and unhindered freedom of religion, which to them meant Christianity.
But they did not want a specific denomination to
hold more power, control, or influence than any other denomination.”
The majority of colonial settlers were Christians…all of one denomination or another
with eventually a handful of Jews making their way to settle in Savannah Georgia.
As Savannah boasts the oldest Temple in the United States.
As the 1787 Constitutional Convention got underway, it was Benjamin Franklin’s
suggestion that participants kneel in prayer.
“I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live,
the more convincing proofs I see of this truth—
that God Governs in the affairs of men.
And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice,
is it possible that an empire can rise with his aid?”
Mr. Fiorazo notes that “Fifty-two of the fifty-six signers of our
Declaration of Independence were deeply committed,
orthodox Christians as well as all thirty-nine signers of the Constitution.
The others agreed the Bible was God’s divine truth and that He personally intervenes
in the lives of people.”
And despite what many folks will tell us today about our founding fathers and their faith,
or lack thereof, they were all either quoted or wrote at one point or another, as referring
to God as Creator…and yes even the deist Thomas Jefferson.
Yet the worry was that the majority of these men were members of the Episcopal Chruch,
and just as in England with the Anglican Chruch, they feared that
the Episcopal church could become a similar state church.
Thomas Jefferson seems to be the person that the Left cites as responsible for
putting up that so-called “wall of separation” between church and state.
Jefferson was not even one of the framers of the First Amendment;
and yet, court cases have been built on this idea,
and laws have been changed because of a false premise.
He used those infamous words just one time–in an 1802 letter to Baptists in Connecticut
who wrote him. they were concerned about their ability to express their faith publicly.
Jefferson wrote back to ensure them that government could not lawfully get in their way.
He also explained the state ould not enforce or favor a single religion.
In the Declaration of Independence, God is mentioned or referred to four times:
as Creator who gives us “certain unalienable rights,” as a sovereign legislator
(Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God), the ultimate authority as
“the Supreme Judge of the world,”
and having faith (a firm reliance on)
in the guardian and protector of mankind (Divine Providence).
Keep this in mind when Jefferson mentions natural rights referring to religious
expression in his reply to the Danbury Baptists.
Isn’t it interesting with all the historical diaries, documents,
and writings available to us, not one of the ninety framers of the Constitution
ever mentioned the phrase “separation of Chruch and state?”
It should amaze us that the very amendment they intended as a restraint upon
government to keep out of religious matters is used today by activists
to hinder the expression of Christianity.
Known as the Establishment Clause,
this amendment was to prevent an official state religion,
but this is most critical to see:
It also prohibits the federal government from favoring non-religion over religion.
Clearly, atheists are winning more court cases today as a result of
[Think Episcopal Chruch as a state-run church]
And so we now see the importance of actually looking back while we continue looking
forward as we learn that what we’ve simply taken for granted is not so simple after all.
“My kingdom is not of this world.
If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting,
that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”
John 18:36 ES
Outstanding, dearest Julie! I think you need to host a political talk show! This is so good! ❤ ❤
I don’t think so—I typed this up yesterday and saved it as I was to be up at 5 having to taking Gregory to the airport as he was to head to Kansas on a hunting trip of sorts.
So I had it all ready to go…or so I thought and I hit ‘save”. Or atleast I thought I did.
A little after 5 this morning before walking out of the door, I grabbed my phone and pushed publish.
Good to go right??
So later when I eventually got back home and had even returned from an emergency run to the vets, I proofread what I hadpublished.
I was baffled when reading over things I saw that whole chunks had not been saved and were now missing. So I’ve had to go back in and edit two more times this afternoon, updating and inserting what I had written last night and sent out in the wee hours thinking I had all things finished…and now countless of folks who have already opened the post and read it won’t see some of those chunks….that I had to just go back in and add!!
oh how I just love technology!!!
Thank you. I remember something I put in a post months ago. Our former president favored a different term, mirroring what Russia has just put into law. You can worship all you want inside your highly taxed place of worship, but as soon as you leave the building, if you say “Praise the Lord” you are heavily fined. The church is heavily fined. And repeat offenders can go to jail. I don’t know if they can enter homes and arrest you for saying your prayers at bedtime.
let us hope not…or we may all be in trouble!!!
Amen. Ouch, I could have just been fined if the wrong people take over.
I fear our jesting might just get real serious in coming years
And what does the old preacher say at the end of his sermon, “And now, let us pray.” Thank you for not being silent.